{"id":183,"date":"2019-04-21T14:15:29","date_gmt":"2019-04-21T12:15:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogbogstaveligt.dk\/?p=183"},"modified":"2022-07-18T22:53:42","modified_gmt":"2022-07-18T20:53:42","slug":"ungdomsvildfarelser","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogbogstaveligt.dk\/?p=183","title":{"rendered":"Ungdomsvildfarelser"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Man kan have mange m\u00e6rkelige synspunkter som ung. Nogen sv\u00e6rger til kommunismens lyksaligheder. Jeg led under den vildfarelse at John Lennon er en st\u00f8rre kunstner end Paul McCartney. Med mindre man er us\u00e6dvanligt virkelighedsresistent, vokser man heldigvis fra den slags vrangforestillinger. Egentlig burde jo enhver diskussion om de to herrers talenter forstumme, n\u00e5r man t\u00e6nker p\u00e5 at McCartney lavede Englands p\u00e5 det tidspunkt mest solgte single, Mull of Kintyre,<\/em> med s\u00e6kkepibe, jeg gentager, med s\u00e6kkepibe<\/strong>, <\/em>som b\u00e6rende instrument.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For at v\u00e6re lidt mere seri\u00f8s: Af gode grunde har McCartney jo haft flere \u00e5r at vise sit v\u00e6rd i. Rob Sheffield anmeldte det seneste album Egypt Station<\/em> og skrev meget tr\u00e6ffende: “Make a list of all the songwriters who were composing great tunes in 1958. Now make an overlapping list of the ones who are still writing brilliant songs in 2018. Your list reads: Paul McCartney”. Enig, og 2018-sangen Dominoes<\/em> er en \u00f8reh\u00e6nger p\u00e5 h\u00f8jde med hans bedste.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

En anden der har skiftet mening er Philip Norman, der i 1981 udgav den st\u00e6rkt McCartney-kritiske Beatles-biografi Shout!<\/em> som ligefrem h\u00e6vder at Lennon var 3\/4 af The Beatles. Ikke uforst\u00e5eligt at McCartney hadede bogen og altid refererede til den som Shite!<\/em> S\u00e5 meget desto mere large af ham, at han senere indvilligede i at afklare sp\u00f8rgsm\u00e5l om de tidlige Hamburg-dage, da Norman skrev John Lennon: the Life<\/em>, og derefter gav ‘tacit approval’ til at Norman ogs\u00e5 kunne give sig i kast med en McCartney-biografi. Udtrykket d\u00e6kker over at McCartney ikke direkte har medvirket, men har ladet forst\u00e5 at han ikke har nogen problemer med projektet, hvilket betyder at Norman har f\u00e5et adgang til interviewkilder, der ellers ikke ville have udtalt sig. Det er der kommet en moppedreng af en biografi ud af – for tiden tilg\u00e6ngelig for r\u00f8rende 59 kr i Arnold Busck – og selv den mest ind\u00e6dte entusiast vil finde ting her han ikke vidste i forvejen. Det var fx nyt for mig at George Harrison d\u00f8de i et af McCartneys huse:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The sad irony of George’s final days was that he was effectively homeless. He would not return to Britain, afraid that fans would hold a ghoulish vigil outside Friar Park, and the journey to his house on Maui in the Hawaiian islands was too complicated, exhausting and vulnerable to media-nuisance.<\/em>
\n\n        Obsessively private to the last, he had hired the celebrity security consultant Gavin de Becker to transport him someplace where he could meet with his wife and son in absolute seclusion. This end-of-the-roadie subsequently announced his death had occurred in Los Angeles, at 1971 Coldwater Canyon.<\/em>
\n\n        No such address existed: George had actually passed away at Paul’s new property on Heather Road, Beverly Hills. In just that same way, when they were school friends at the Inny, he’d so often suggested, ‘Why don’t you come round to my house?’<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jeg har i perioder holdt pause fra McCartney pga hans store ego, som kan v\u00e6re virkelig anstrengende hvis man ser ham i et interview, men jeg bliver ved at vende tilbage pga det centrale: musikken.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Man kan have mange m\u00e6rkelige synspunkter som ung. Nogen sv\u00e6rger til kommunismens lyksaligheder. Jeg led under den vildfarelse at John Lennon er en st\u00f8rre kunstner end Paul McCartney. Med mindre man er us\u00e6dvanligt virkelighedsresistent, vokser man heldigvis fra den slags vrangforestillinger. Egentlig burde jo enhver diskussion om de to herrers talenter forstumme, n\u00e5r man t\u00e6nker … <\/p>\n

L\u00e6s videre “Ungdomsvildfarelser”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[33,34],"class_list":["post-183","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-paul-mccartney","tag-philip-norman"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogbogstaveligt.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogbogstaveligt.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogbogstaveligt.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogbogstaveligt.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogbogstaveligt.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=183"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/blogbogstaveligt.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":238,"href":"https:\/\/blogbogstaveligt.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183\/revisions\/238"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogbogstaveligt.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=183"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogbogstaveligt.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=183"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogbogstaveligt.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=183"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}